The lesson that hasn't been learned in these three years is that SCV2 was never a "threat" for 99% of the population, and that the Chinese copied lockdowns/mandates resulting in TRADING the lives of the young for the lives of the octogenarians.
There can NEVER be an effective vaccine against Coronaviruses, because Coronavirus immunity is by definition Partial & Transient.
All Pandemic Preparedness Plans up until 2020 (written by competent PH experts) emphasized a voluntary health approach, not an enforcement approach
The evidence for "community masks" is equal to the evidence for "IVM", which is to say nil.
This was not a "pandemic" in the true sense, and SCV2 was most certainly not a "novel" virus according to traditional definitions of novel. But of course, in 2020, the Medical Industrial Complex changed a bunch of definitions.
There was only one reason for all this authoritarianism and fascism (merger of corporations and governments): profits.
It's been incredibly disappointing to watch the Left become the anti-science we long accused the right of.
Great post. I think it would be very helpful if our leaders were talking more along these lines explicitly, and to try to have more of a public conversation about the values that underly decisions about public health measures. (For example here in Québec there was little effort to explain and justify the decision to impose such extreme measures as the curfew in place early this winter, nor the decision to quickly roll back measures like vaccine requirements and capacity limits later this winter — what are we trying to accomplish and how do the decisions about measures in place get us there? It’s an obvious question being oddly ignored in public)
"...evolution selects for viruses that spread well, and whether that makes disease severity go up or down is mostly a matter of luck."
This is important! I don't know how many times I've heard complacent people say that viruses evolve to become more benign because they "don't want to kill their hosts", but they forget that the mechanism through which natural selection imposes that rule is the host dying along with the virus.
If Covid is not over (I concur) and will remain with us much like influenza, is anyone developing a traditional vaccine instead of all these genome-altering mRNA type treatments? If not, why not?
I heard Dr. Fauci speak last week and he essentially said what you have said. The good doctor received a Gairdner Foundation award here in Toronto a few years back. The video is well worht a watch.https://gairdner.org/winners/index-of-winners/
The lesson that hasn't been learned in these three years is that SCV2 was never a "threat" for 99% of the population, and that the Chinese copied lockdowns/mandates resulting in TRADING the lives of the young for the lives of the octogenarians.
There can NEVER be an effective vaccine against Coronaviruses, because Coronavirus immunity is by definition Partial & Transient.
All Pandemic Preparedness Plans up until 2020 (written by competent PH experts) emphasized a voluntary health approach, not an enforcement approach
The evidence for "community masks" is equal to the evidence for "IVM", which is to say nil.
This was not a "pandemic" in the true sense, and SCV2 was most certainly not a "novel" virus according to traditional definitions of novel. But of course, in 2020, the Medical Industrial Complex changed a bunch of definitions.
There was only one reason for all this authoritarianism and fascism (merger of corporations and governments): profits.
It's been incredibly disappointing to watch the Left become the anti-science we long accused the right of.
Great post. I think it would be very helpful if our leaders were talking more along these lines explicitly, and to try to have more of a public conversation about the values that underly decisions about public health measures. (For example here in Québec there was little effort to explain and justify the decision to impose such extreme measures as the curfew in place early this winter, nor the decision to quickly roll back measures like vaccine requirements and capacity limits later this winter — what are we trying to accomplish and how do the decisions about measures in place get us there? It’s an obvious question being oddly ignored in public)
"...evolution selects for viruses that spread well, and whether that makes disease severity go up or down is mostly a matter of luck."
This is important! I don't know how many times I've heard complacent people say that viruses evolve to become more benign because they "don't want to kill their hosts", but they forget that the mechanism through which natural selection imposes that rule is the host dying along with the virus.
If Covid is not over (I concur) and will remain with us much like influenza, is anyone developing a traditional vaccine instead of all these genome-altering mRNA type treatments? If not, why not?
I heard Dr. Fauci speak last week and he essentially said what you have said. The good doctor received a Gairdner Foundation award here in Toronto a few years back. The video is well worht a watch.https://gairdner.org/winners/index-of-winners/